literature

A Rose for Whom it May Concern

Deviation Actions

ToXTheXMorgueX's avatar
Published:
1K Views

Literature Text

We hung our legs over the edge of a springtime of wisteria, calling back to the birds that made their homecoming heard. We told you, try listening with your ears instead of with your predisposition. You were hardly in a position to argue with Father watching from the window. You asked us when roses would be in bloom, and we laughed at you.

"You more stupid than you look, boy? You see any rosebushes here?"

You said, well, no. But roses had always been your favorite. So the girls all giggled at you and the boys laughed too hard just because that's the way that boys are. "Roses?" They chided you, and continued to laugh, and you looked upon them with disdainful familiarity.

I said to you, don't worry about it, the new kid always has it rough.

When summer came we told you to try not to breathe so deeply - oleanders were in bloom that time of year. You had two black eyes and ten different stories for each, but it was summer and we were kids. When you're a kid, belief is relative. If there were ten of us, and only ten, and we all believed something, didn't that technically make it true?

As in, yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. Just don't tell mom and dad because they'll say no, and then it can't be true anymore. But if there's no one to yell false, then that's that, and your bruises came from falling down or walking in the dark.

What did we care, anyway, with beauty and danger both blooming in the heat; you suggested without smiling that it was a good time of year for poison to be so abundant.

We were all sort of walking in the dark, anyway.

With the arrival of autumn we played in the leaves as though we had never aged at all, but you maintained that it was your least favorite season because everything was dying, and there was no way to stop it. We didn't know what to say, so we told you that, well, that's the point, right? Give everything a nice farewell and then await its return. Except you just shook your head and walked away, and we still didn't really worry.

We should have worried, probably. Because we knew that you didn't want to be at home. So where could you be if not with us?

And when winter chased off all our midnight games of cops and robbers, it chased you off too. We were always come and go like that, I guess.

Before the service, they told us all that roses were expensive, and it was nice of us to want to buy them, but unnecessary.

We didn't understand that unnecessary was a euphemism for people not wanting to spend money on dead kids.

So we pooled all of our money together and bought as many roses as we could afford, and the girls didn't giggle and the boys didn't laugh. We didn't really look each other in the eyes anymore; it was, in essence, the act of being led away from the dark. In our new, clumsy youth, we stumbled across uneven surfaces, fawns unused to life and light, blinking away the confusion. We never talked about it after that day; some silent mutual agreement stated that, well, no one needs to know that it was sort of our fault, that we should have seen it coming, that we should have said something.

I figure that it's just belief, being relative again. If there were ten of us, and only ten, and we all believed that we couldn't have done anything, then it had to be true. There was no one to contradict us.

Except, well, there was. Because I don't think we ever really believed it.

As in, no, Virginia, there is no Santa Claus.

Just please don't tell mom and dad.
Title is an indirect reference to William Faulkner's A Rose for Emily. Prose itself has references to Church's old editorial in the New York Sun, Is there a Santa Claus?.

Personally, I would say yes.

But that's probably just because I'm alone right now.

Who's to say otherwise?

In other words, if a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it, does it still make a sound?

But those really are other words.

I love comments and critiques.

:iconthewrittenrevolution:

In this piece, I'm most concerned about whether or not I got the point across. What did you get from this passage? Was the diction consistent/appropriate? Did the diction add to the mood?
:heart:Nikki
© 2010 - 2024 ToXTheXMorgueX
Comments44
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
multicolored's avatar
Hello there from :iconcritiquing-club:!

Firstly I'd like to say that your diction did in fact add to the mood- lightening up a sad story, almost trivializing it like most people do with most situations throughout life, but directly addressing that indifference in the ending.

The diction in the beginning, however, is a bit inconsistent. For instance

'We told you, try listening with your ears instead of with your predisposition. You were hardly in a position to argue with Father watching from the window.'

seemed particularly inconsistent, mainly because it's the introduction. 'predisposition' seems really out of place given the surrounding text, so I would suggest using a simpler word. It actually flows well saying 'disposition' and 'position' immediately after (as opposed to being redundant) but that style of writing doesn't continue, so it seems out of place.

In some parts I think you overdid the 'I guess'es and 'well,''s. These should be used minimally, or at least with longer breaks in between them. Some lines should be said with more confidence, such as:

'We didn't understand that unnecessary was a euphemism for people not wanting to spend money on dead kids, I guess.'

The 'I guess' was unnecessary, no euphemism intended d:. When I'm reading that phrase, I really read it as a fact that the speaker grudgingly admits to. This sentence is a criticism, and rarely do we grudgingly criticize.

I really love this line:

'If there were ten of us, and only ten, and we all believed something, didn't that technically make it true?'

It reminds me of something I used to say as a child, and it really sums up a major idea and feeling this work brings to the readers, especially when it's repeated (and refuted) at the end.

I think that's about it. Mostly, just clean up the 'Wells' and 'I guesses' and you'll have an excellent piece. Hopefully I was able to help. :heart: